SmG Rebel Wrote:SmG Battlefire Wrote:If they don't add any physical aspects to the engine. Crysis will suck.
Have you ever even played crysis? or are you just judging it? Crysis is a really good game and the physical aspects to it are awesome.. Play is before you judge it.. If you don't like it, then don't say it just sucks because other people probably like it.. I loved crysis 2. I had more fun with crysis than halo 4..
Don't accuse before knowing is what's like it. I have played them all. First one was the funnest. There's not physical aspect to the engine whatsoever. Tell me one that is. It's all about graphics that's it. Where's the actual water simulations? Wind simulation? Evolution?
Example:
See the water. That's nothing but flatness but with small bumps with wave animation to make it look like simulation. But over all it's flat.
Now also you should have notice the contrast of the light and shadow. Unreal did a way better job on that then Cry engine. IW even too. Which is ridicules. What they must do is get the actual physical aspect. Add evolution to it. Add physics to it. But right now Frostbite 3 is way ahead. Unreal is getting there too. Cry must get there and even more when the next game will come out.
Edit: Great picture on what I was talking about on water.