Current time: 05 May 2024, 10:01 AM



Is it more honorable to win a game of chess without losing many pieces?
Offline SmG Batman

The Dark Knight Of SmG
Senior Member
******
5 Years of Service
Posts: 479
Threads: 222
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 125
Discord: Battoween#2223
Discord WarriorEmerald DonatorBronze MedalDonatorDiscord MasterThanks From CloudTwitterScout
#1
Star  Is it more honorable to win a game of chess without losing many pieces?

Let me tell you about a chess game that was played once.


On move 17, the white player lost a knight for a pawn. On move 20, he lost a bishop for a pawn. On move 25, he lost a rook for a bishop. On move 26, he lost a full bishop. On move 28, he lost a full knight. On move 30, he lost a full rook. On move 41, he lost a queen for a rook.
In fact, the white player in question lost all his pieces. What a dishonorable loss, you might say.


Yet he didn’t lose. He won. Even better, his opponent was a grandmaster.


I’m talking about the legendary game Grigory Yuryevich Serper vs Ioannis Nikolaidis (1993), in which Grigory Serper sacrificed all his pieces and still won
[Image: Webp.net-gifmaker_1.gif]

Thanks to my boy @"Ramen Resangen"  for the awesome signature! 
21 Aug 2018, 01:11 AM
Find Reply


Messages In This Thread
Is it more honorable to win a game of chess without losing many pieces? - by Batman - 21 Aug 2018, 01:11 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
SmG Gaming, © 2010-2024
Theme By: «SmG» Cloud
Edited by: «SmG» Wires