[«SmG» Wires]

The staff team have their arsenal of tools to investigate and determine what happened in any ban appeal. Further more, if a person has created a ban appeal, that means they have been banned, which means the staff have some sort of concrete evidence of rule-breaking. So given we already have the evidence we need, why would we need further input from members?

We also have something I like to call "Standard of Proof". This comes in the following forms: Screenshots, Audio/Video Recordings and Staff Witnesses.

This is nothing short of a terrible idea. No, no and no.