[Thomasxp5]

Why did faint get banned but not me?

[TyvekH2Vs]

We talk about u in the open not in the members section. All you orange guys argue to much.

My response to this is relatively simple. No, we do not. Rather, far too often is it that we actually speak our minds. I am an Orange guy, however, my intention is NEVER, and will never be to start arguments. The entire cause of all of these threads is the actually posting of opinions. Faint and in some instances Thomas do this. Opinions that are valid in every way.

When post are made in threads created by almost anyone, people with standards that are higher, and are willing to state an opinion, that is deserving to be posted, and that can be easily defended in the fact that they are true. Arguments are not started by people like Faint, Thomas or I. They are started by the people who fail to respond in an intellectual manner.

In almost every thread I make posts in I remain civil, and use logical arguments, not spam and insults, as my primary weapon. And as Faint had said, our criticisms and responses to new threads are "polite, and in most cases, not intentionally offensive." People that are not willing to examine a post on a topic, and to improve on the things criticized upon, or reply in a reasonable way that would be civil, and respectable.

Another reason for these absolutely absurd bans is an over abundance of administrators, the moderators on this website, have typically proven to be bias against non members, and in doing so have cause more trouble that they are worth. With a small cite like this at absolute most 2 moderators are needed, not 12 (or however many it is).

Another cause has been the rules about causing fights and being nice (just realized how stupid of a rhyme that is.) These rules will cause more problems than they solve. This is how: A person makes an innocent criticism upon a topic of a thread. The poster of that thread that comes back with a typical response of: "you just dont like the video becus you dont think im as good as you. and you cant acept that i put a lot off effort into making it." (Yes, I know I'm hitting a little hard on the video example). When that is done, the person who made the original criticism is given a warning about spamming; even though the reply to the thread may have been entirely reasonable. There is no way that kind of logic (which there are multiple examples of on this forum) should be tolerated ANYWHERE.

K, I'm done.

[AnaRCHy]

Do you expect anyway to read that?

[TyvekH2Vs]

No I clearly don't expect a person who goes by "Anyway" to read that.

If you ment anyone, and I hope you ment that, then yes, as both Thomas and Faint have.



But the irony in that post was just briliant.

[Gre3n To bLaCk]

ment. LOL

[Brooney > Any clan]

We talk about u in the open not in the members section. All you orange guys argue to much.

My response to this is relatively simple. No, we do not. Rather, far too often is it that we actually speak our minds. I am an Orange guy, however, my intention is NEVER, and will never be to start arguments. The entire cause of all of these threads is the actually posting of opinions. Faint and in some instances Thomas do this. Opinions that are valid in every way.

When post are made in threads created by almost anyone, people with standards that are higher, and are willing to state an opinion, that is deserving to be posted, and that can be easily defended in the fact that they are true. Arguments are not started by people like Faint, Thomas or I. They are started by the people who fail to respond in an intellectual manner.

In almost every thread I make posts in I remain civil, and use logical arguments, not spam and insults, as my primary weapon. And as Faint had said, our criticisms and responses to new threads are "polite, and in most cases, not intentionally offensive." People that are not willing to examine a post on a topic, and to improve on the things criticized upon, or reply in a reasonable way that would be civil, and respectable.

Another reason for these absolutely absurd bans is an over abundance of administrators, the moderators on this website, have typically proven to be bias against non members, and in doing so have cause more trouble that they are worth. With a small cite like this at absolute most 2 moderators are needed, not 12 (or however many it is).

Another cause has been the rules about causing fights and being nice (just realized how stupid of a rhyme that is.) These rules will cause more problems than they solve. This is how: A person makes an innocent criticism upon a topic of a thread. The poster of that thread that comes back with a typical response of: "you just dont like the video becus you dont think im as good as you. and you cant acept that i put a lot off effort into making it." (Yes, I know I'm hitting a little hard on the video example). When that is done, the person who made the original criticism is given a warning about spamming; even though the reply to the thread may have been entirely reasonable. There is no way that kind of logic (which there are multiple examples of on this forum) should be tolerated ANYWHERE.

K, I'm done.

'clap clap clap'

[Cobra]

Why do people post paragraphs of crap and expect somebody to read it? This is what we don't do POST SPAMMING.

[Brooney > Any clan]

Why do people post paragraphs of crap and expect somebody to read it? This is what we don't do POST SPAMMING.

In all honesty, I did actually agree on the points given in that long post. His post was rather serious as well, it was definitely not crap.

[Phorky]

the moderators on this website, have typically proven to be bias against non members,

if you paid attention, you'd notice that i said i'll ban ANYONE. members or not. if I got to Faint before AnaRCHy did then he wouldn't be the only one banned. the reason I brought up banning for this in the first place is because im just tired of it happening non-stop. everytime i would visit the site (Often) I would always see some sort of Argument happening. As much as i agree that everyones opinions should be stated if they have on, i do think that if it'll cause more "opinions" against one another.

...reading this i just saw complete Irony twards me xD fail...

[Thomasxp5]

the moderators on this website, have typically proven to be bias against non members,

if you paid attention, you'd notice that i said i'll ban ANYONE. members or not. if I got to Faint before AnaRCHy did then he wouldn't be the only one banned. the reason I brought up banning for this in the first place is because im just tired of it happening non-stop. everytime i would visit the site (Often) I would always see some sort of Argument happening. As much as i agree that everyones opinions should be stated if they have on, i do think that if it'll cause more "opinions" against one another.

...reading this i just saw complete Irony twards me xD fail...

You guys are tossing the word ban around way to much lately.