Username:

**Ray88** · 30 May 2016, 09:21 PM

your eyes should only be focused on the middle monitor, the other two are just aiding your peripheral vision

**Beasty** · 30 May 2016, 11:51 PM

(30 May 2016, 09:21 PM)SmG Ray88 Wrote: your eyes should only be focused on the middle monitor, the other two are just aiding your peripheral vision

Nah dude ur other monitors are for running multiple desktops so you can watch a movie while u game obv.

**Ray88** · 31 May 2016, 09:33 AM

aside from rts games, who the fk turns their head when they have triple display

**SmG xBr4v3x** · 31 May 2016, 03:08 PM

(31 May 2016, 09:33 AM)SmG Ray88 Wrote: aside from rts games, who the fk turns their head when they have triple display

You'd have to if you had 3 34" ultrawide unless you sat away from them, I see no point in that much estate unless you had them in a racing simulator rig.

**Ray88** · 31 May 2016, 04:43 PM

actually no, the other two displays aid in your peripheral vision as i said earlier
it just provides better immersion as they're too stretched out to see anything useful; aside from rts games

**SmG Lightning** · 31 May 2016, 11:14 PM

to bad that 2 rx 480s gonna beat the 1080 now you should of waited lol

**SmG xBr4v3x** · 01 Jun 2016, 04:34 AM

(31 May 2016, 11:14 PM)SmG Lightning Wrote: to bad that 2 rx 480s gonna beat the 1080 now you should of waited lol

ONLY in titles that support CF(AND with graphics tuned down), not that many recent games really do, DX12 has good support for it, but the devs have to add that support in. Rather have One beefy card vs 2 when you'd be guaranteed to use the full power of your card 100% of the time, instead of hoping you could use the dual setup and miss out in titles.

ALSO, the proof of being better vs the 1080 with the Ashes games, they used Low/Med graphics on TWO 480's vs the 1080 running at High/Max.

=============================

Instead of $500 for dual 480, just drop $380 or so on a single 1070 and save the rest for a good ssd or something

**Ray88** · 01 Jun 2016, 09:30 AM

How do you know that aots was running on low settings?
Dx12 is the future, considering pascal barely runs faster then the fury/fury x in dx12 titles since they dont have async compute and nvidia rely on raw processing power.

**SmG xBr4v3x** · 02 Jun 2016, 02:12 AM

(01 Jun 2016, 09:30 AM)SmG Ray88 Wrote: How do you know that aots was running on low settings?
Dx12 is the future, considering pascal barely runs faster then the fury/fury x in dx12 titles since they dont have async compute and nvidia rely on raw processing power.

[Image: index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=219...002a287bc1]

[Image: index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=21814]

[Image: index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=21953]

**Ray88** · 02 Jun 2016, 09:58 AM

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/4m...ntroversy/
http://videocardz.com/60860/amd-explains...onstration

Username:
Username:
Password:	Lost Password? If you are an SmG member do not add the SmG Prefix to your name it is automatically done for you.
	Remember me