[BionicleZac]

Which do you think is noobeir?

Shields
or
No shields?

I think shields cuz you can stand there shooting the person for the longest time and they will not die ><
I like the more realistic approach with no shields and snipers. :D

[SmG chimney pipe]

noob

[Daeth]

noob

saw that a mile away.

[KOD Ashtan]

I like the more realistic approach with no shields and snipers. :D

That is why I hate CoD. With no shields there's like no skill at all.

Only skill is reaction time, other then that it's whoever shots someone first. It's gay and deserves to burn in hell like all Elites >.>

Oh and no I'm not just directing Elite comments at you. Everyone knows I hate Elite's, not the people that play them (Unless you're a complete noob *cough* Cobra H1 *cough*) :up:

[IcedOut]

thts y i hate cod to

[{XF}Regulate]

Apparently, you haven't played COD 4. You do have the option of using more stopping power or increased health. Just so that you are aware if both have shields then the skill still depends on reaction time still. Now if you have no shield and the other does, then skill is killing the guy with the shields before you get killed by him. So, which is the more noob thing, I would say hacking since that takes no skill or reaction time.

I prefer H2V for rox and swords, but I can be a good flag capture if I have a good team to back me up or a good driver if I have a good shooter. The only thing I hate is when I drive and the shooter stays in the car shooting, which is fine to protect the vehicle, but when I get out of the base with the flag they need to get out and drive and stop shooting. Dumb punks always gets me killed.

[«SmG» Cloud]

i agree with Regulate. It depends on the perks your using in cod

[AnaRCHy]

NOOOOOB

[BionicleZac]

XD fiiiiiiine so im a N00B that loves swat lol BUT shields r fine, yeah.

[Cookie]

I am confused by what you just said...